I was recently reminded of what it was like for me in the 80's looking for work, knowing that I had to be employed when I got old enough to graduate high school or I would be out on the street. I walked over 10 miles in 105 degree heat and knocked on every place that might hire a kid off the street. I applied at shoe stores, I applied as a floor sweeper at a fast food joint, and I applied everywhere that they did not tell me to get out because they had no work.
Aside from a Flock of Seagulls and some Twins not even related to each other, the 80's kinda sucked. Especially the job market.
There was no internet. You found work by going and talking to people, lots of people. By the time I reached Freeport Boulevard, I had walked from Florin-Perkins Road in the noon sun, after having canvassed from my street and neighborhood south of there. I wasn't having much luck, and really it was even worse because I was limited by not having a car or a bike at the time.
It wasn't until I reached an office complex at the end of my trip until someone treated me civilly and offered me some water and a chance to sit down and talk. They also offered me a job if I got my high school degree by next June.
There wasn't much thinking to do about taking the job. My other options were to go into selling speed and pot with some of my friends, or joining a gang and planning crimes. Really, that was about it, unless I wanted to steal a bike and widen my search space to, say, Oak Park where job prospects were bleaker.
Well, I wasn't into stealing or selling drugs. At least, I figured, that made me a moral person.
The irony, of course, is that I took the job to join a group who excel at one thing, and that is killing and brutalizing other people. I was able to rationalize the whole thing, and tell myself that I would only be participating in the deaths of people who we had a legitimate reason to fight with, and that we had learned our lessons from Vietnam and weren't going to go down that road again any time soon. Well, really, I told myself these things to rationalize that getting job training, life experience outside of the ghetto, and money that I would otherwise never get for college were worth possibly killing people over, if they were bad people.
Now that I am older I can look back and reflect on the irony that becoming a paid killer was a much better choice than simply selling people substances that they choose to take in order to have some fun and escape from their lives for a little while. Or, that creatively redistributing the wealth of others somehow was worse than being ordered to choose who dies in some foreign land. It is easy to make almost anything more palatable, even killing folks, if you state it the right way. You can even make it part of the culture, complete with rituals, exercises, prayers, and devotionals to ideals that few will ever really have a shot at living.
So I am now at a point in my life where my friends' kids are having to make similar choices. I get to watch them agonize over which direction their very limited lives should go, in an economy that is agonizingly worse and with much fewer job prospects in spite of having an internet and better public transportation. What kind of advice can I really give to a kid who has been held up at gunpoint twice in one year? What can I say when he has been looking for work for a year and a half with no bites? How can I convince him that staying in a 3 bedroom apartment shared between seven people is going to get better when his dad is treading water with what most people would call a "good job"?
All of his friends are in worse situations, with the lucky exclusion of none of them having been shot yet.
For all of my own experiences, and my vaunted values of non-violence as a Quaker, I cannot tell him to just buck it up and that things will work themselves out. That would be a lie. So, instead, I will accept that the world is imperfect, and that his situation is untenable, and I will give his family advice on how to do the minimum in support of murder while maximizing the benefits of the returns for his service.
I would not do this if I thought there was a better way. I am not going to ask him to stick it out for my principles, ones that he may not even hold. But what really grabs me is when my fellow humanitarians bemoan how everyone has a choice to kill, about how angry it makes them when people so cavalierly take the lives of others. I just shake my head in silence, as those in the peace movement so clearly value human life less than those who advocate for war.
There is a disconnect among those who practice peace in the United States, one that is crippling their cause and their purpose. On the one hand, the military offers people with a high school diploma and no skills an opportunity to gain experience, some marketable job skills, four years of work history, tens of thousands of dollars for college, progress toward a two or four year degree while being enlisted, housing benefits, room and board, clothing, and a stipend. On the other hand, there is not ONE peace related cause that will have ANY need for a high school graduate with no experience or skills, which will turn out a better person at the end of four years with a new start and the life knowledge to see new possibilities. Not one. The disconnect, if you cannot see it spelled out, is that people in the peace world will willingly support prisoners, refugees, the mentally ill homeless, abused mothers, etc- but they will not nurture anyone. How can one say they value life so much more than the military, when the value of the lives they hold dear is consistently held at a level of bare subsistence?
The peace community falls prey to the same idea that the value of human life is a commodity, something that can be traded upon, the suffering mitigated, but never much more than a minimum value that can be attained. What is truly sad, what makes my head slowly shake from side to side, is that people who believe that war can solve many of our issues are the ones raising the bar of human commodity higher, banding together over generations to make fighting wars a profession, giving those who submit to joining the military an extra boost to acheive a more stable standard of living. Not the peace people, the war people, are doing this.
There is no Peace Academy, teaching civil engineering and community building, that any high school graduate may apply to and strive for success with merely the clothes on their back and the head on their shoulders. There are no Reconstruction Societies where those with fewer opportunities are able to give service in peace to their communities and communities around the world, where they come out with more options than when they went in. But there are soup kitchens everywhere...
Consider the value of the market in human life, and think of how much peace values it.